According to the psychiatric party line, ADHD is a mental
disorder involving a dysfunction in some as of yet unspecified brain systems
involved in sensory and/or behavioral inhibition and control. In the classroom,
ADHD children have difficulty following instructions, staying on task, standing
in line, sitting in their chairs, keeping their hands and their thoughts to
themselves, and are generally disruptive of the educational process and a nuisance
to the teacher and the other students. The disorder is treated with the regular
application of stimulant medication, which has a "paradoxical effect" on ADHD
kids and calms them down.
A few psychologists—a maligned minority—have begun to
suspect that the ADHD label is really just a way of dealing with kids who are having
an adverse reaction to the mindlessness of formal education and who resist the authoritarian
strictures of the classroom environment. Many ADHD kids who can’t stay on task for more than 30 seconds in the
classroom can concentrate for hours at a time on tasks they find personally interesting—and
the stimulant drugs work precisely because, like other recreational substances,
they make things more interesting.
From an authentic human standpoint, it is the non-ADHD kids,
the ones who follow the rules without question, the ones who readily take on a
posture of passive subservience to adult authority and group conformity, the
ones who are able to acclimate to the captivity and the mindless routines of
the classroom, who are truly dysfunctional.
Consider a recent study (full reference below) that looked at how the inclusion of
an ADHD child impacts the social behavior of elementary children working in
cooperative problem-solving groups. The researchers
compared the performance of groups that that did and did not include a child labeled
at-risk for ADHD. Although the at-risk
children engaged in more negative, off-task, and "uncooperative" behavior, the
groups that included an at-risk child were more than five times as likely to be
successful at the problem solving task than groups that did not include an
at-risk child.
The researchers called this simply an "unexpected result."
And in fact the result makes no sense at all if you assume that ADHD
reflects mental dysfunction. But
if ADHD is simply a label given to kids who refuse to relinquish their freedom
and autonomy, kids who can still think outside the box because their thought
process has yet to be totally boxed in, then the result makes perfect sense:
adding an at-risk-for-ADHD kid to the group should lead to better problem
solving success relative to groups consisting entirely of children who are already
firmly on the path to becoming full-fledged sheep.
__
Zentall,
S. S., Kuester, D. A., & Craig, B. A. (2011). Social Behavior in
Cooperative Groups: Students at Risk for ADHD and Their Peers. Journal Of
Educational Research, 104(1), 28-41.
No comments:
Post a Comment