If technology is causing the problem, then the solution is
not more technology. But the global corporate machine establishes the rules of
engagement, so all problems are essentially ones of implementation—literally a
result of not having the right implements.
If global warming is being caused by too much industrial
CO2, then the industrial process needs to be retooled in a way that leads to a
slower increase in CO2 production. (And where retooling would cut too deeply
into the corporate bottom line, propagandists stand at the ready with bullshit
ideas like "clean coal.")
If bees die because of exposure to plants that have been
genetically modified to produce their own pesticide, then we need to modify the
plants further so they don’t need bees.
If factory agriculture leads to nutritionally deficient
food, then we need to consume artificial supplements. If consuming factory
farmed and genetically modified food causes cancer, then obviously we need to develop
better cancer treatments.
And when the human psyche begins to buckle under the
pressure of its industrialized burden, we have supportive "emotional
technologies" such as psychotherapy, 12-step programs, and selective serotonin
reuptake inhibitors.
When we catch a cold virus, it is the symptoms that we are
most concerned with. The coughing, sneezing, fever, and physical discomfort are
how we know we are infected. But the symptoms are not produced by the virus,
they are produced by the body in response to the virus. The symptoms are the
body’s natural defenses—and a sign of a healthy immune system. Increased mucus
production is the body’s way of removing virus-infected tissues from throat and
nasal passages to the stomach where they can be destroyed by digestive acids.
Fever is the body’s attempt to overheat the temperature-sensitive virus. Commercial
cold treatments target the symptoms and not the virus itself. Ironically, over
the counter cold medication, by reducing the symptoms, actually works in favor
of the virus by interfering with the body’s natural defenses.
Two things that we should take from this: first, that the true
target might not be what we think it is, and in order to see this it is
necessary to look below the surface; second, that if we don’t look below the surface
we run the risk that the most obvious "treatment" might actually make things
worse in the long run.
Power carries an additional risk. The power to alleviate a few of the surface symptoms
can mislead us into thinking that we understand the problem. Because we can devise
a technological solution to a problem does not mean that the problem was caused
by the lack of appropriate technology any more than headaches are caused by a lack
of aspirin.
I could not have put it as clearly and concisely as you just did.
ReplyDelete